National Human Rights Consultation Submission 

AGWW-7QWCN2 

Name: Gary Adams 

Submission Text: 

The proposed human rights charter if enacted with a
 
responsibilities code will not be human rights, but limited rights. You see
 
human rights by international consensus is a universal concept, not limited
 
by a cost of responsibilities.
 

 
The intended human rights charter is supposed to protect our rights as
 
citezens. But the people who need the most protection can still have their
 
human rights abused if a code of responsibilities is anacted. Becuase a
 
public servant can justify the abuse and not recognise the citezens rights
 
by hiding behind the code of responsibilites decalaring the citzen dosent
 
meet the code of responsibilities.
 

 
So how does this protect a citizen when all the government has do to is
 
declare that you dont meet the code of responsibilites and then have the
 
right to abuse your human rights. Where is the protection for people who
 
are aqused of not meeting the code of responsibilites. This isnt human
 
rights this is limited rights.
 

 
The commitee charged with this is stating that they dont want a repeat of
 
the villians act in the UK, where a handfull of villians are aqused of
 
hiding behind the human rights act. Now what about all the UK citizens that
 
were protected by the human rights act from the villans in the UK public
 
service. If they impose a code of reponsibilities how many UK public
 
servants would have ligitimised the human rights abuse by hiding behind a
 
code of responsibilites.
 

 
We need to check whith a UK human rights charity and check the statistics
 
on this.
 

 
So if you are going to propose a limited rights clasue that is code of
 
responsibilities please make another declaration on the rights of people
 
who wont have their human rights recognised by the state due to not meeting
 
a responsibilities clause.
 

 
Please do not impiliment a responsibilites clause becuase the moemnt you do
 
the act propsed isnt human rights its limited rights and will jsutify the
 
abuse of people public servants dont like. it will create a loop hole of
 
abuse. thus making it a dummy act that is a feel good pretend human rights
 
act. you see whats the point of having a human rights act to protect people
 
from public seervants that abuse them, when all the public service has to
 
do is declare that you dont meet the code of resposibilkites so they can
 
abuse you anyway. 

Page 1 of 1