National Human Rights Consultation Submission 

AGWW-7QY69H 

Name: Adrian Gunton 

Submission Text: 

Are you aware of this:
 

 
Britain’s chief Charter of Rights promoter, Jack Straw, now admits his
 
Charter of Rights is a “villain’s charter” because it help villains while
 
victims are discarded and the community abandoned.
 

 
This is relevant because at the Brisbane roundtable Father Brennan
 
suggested that the British model was a good example of a Charter of Rights.
 
If the main advocate of a Charter in Britain admits that it is a bad idea,
 
why is it supported by the panel?
 

 
Furthermore, why does the panel consist of people who all have the same
 
opinion on this issue? Where's the diversity?
 

 
Regards,
 

 
Adrian Gunton. 

Page 1 of 1